COVID-19 Is a Convenient Excuse to Expel Refugees

COVID-19 Is a Convenient Excuse to Expel Refugees

Originally Published in Slate

Ray Suarez - August 24, 2020

The Trump administration is now sending asylum-seekers back without even a hearing.

A shirtless man, a woman in a mask, and a small girl in a diaper pose for a photo in front of a makeshift tent.
Denis Flores, Diana Gimenez, and their child, all of whom are seeking asylum in the U.S., pose for a photo in the migrant camp in Matamoros, Mexico, on April 1. Go Nakamura/Reuters

Here in the U.S., the pandemic has brought a lot of things to a halt, but one thing it hasn’t stopped is the flow of people seeking asylum. People are still showing up at the border, hoping to escape brutal conditions in their home countries. And the U.S. government is supposed to hear these people out. But Adolfo Flores, who covers immigration policy for BuzzFeed News, says that’s not happening right now. Back in March, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said undocumented immigrants could no longer be safely detained at the border while they awaited processing because of the pandemic. “They are quickly sent back to Mexico in less than two hours without any access to our immigration court system,” Flores says.

The government has also scrapped many of the protections in place for unaccompanied minors—kids who have crossed the border and are trying to stay in the U.S. The Trump administration insists this is all necessary to minimize the spread of the coronavirus. But critics, like the American Civil Liberties Union, say the U.S. government is using the crisis to continue the president’s crackdown on immigrants. I spoke with Flores about how the Trump administration is denying immigrants and asylum-seekers access to the U.S. legal system, and what that means for the adults—and children—fleeing violence in their home countries. Our conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Ray Suarez: Before COVID-19, was the United States able to handle the flow of asylum-seekers? Were those cases being adjudicated before and theyre not now?

Adolfo Flores: They were, but there was—and there is—a massive backlog in cases. So people’s cases were taking years to be adjudicated. But the administration had another policy before this, the so-called Remain in Mexico program. And that forced immigrants and asylum-seekers to wait in Mexico while their cases were adjudicated. But even then, people were waiting more than a year in some cases.

So this is a policy thats been in flux already, regardless of COVID-19. People who once would show up at the border and have an asylum process scheduled and be kept in custody on the U.S. side of the border or released to relatives or allowed to remain at large were being pushed back into Mexico already. Now theyre being pushed back into Mexico and not even being given a hearing?

That’s exactly what’s happening.

Does the law give a lot of power to the executive branch in dealing with the day-to-day treatment of attempted border crossers and asylum requests? Is there normally a lot of latitude in the executive branch?

The last three years have shown that there is more latitude than we previously thought. The changes in the policies under this administration, they don’t always stick, but there’s always a new one. There’s always something on the horizon to take over. Remain in Mexico is a good example. That was one thing. And now we have these expulsions. Of course, they say that this is because of the pandemic and we need to stop the spread of COVID- 19. But I think that the last few years have shown how much power and influence the executive branch does have in changing or adopting our immigration system.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.


%d bloggers like this: